Project delivery methods in construction

Project Delivery Methods in Construction: A Guide for Beginners

Introduction

In the world of construction, successful project delivery is crucial to ensure timely completion, cost-effectiveness, and client satisfaction. The process of bringing a construction project to life involves a series of well-coordinated steps, and selecting the right project delivery method is paramount to its success. In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the different project delivery methods used in construction, understand their characteristics, and advantages, and how to choose the most suitable approach for your specific project. Whether you are a novice or a seasoned professional, understanding these methods is essential for a successful construction journey.

Articles you may also like –

Ancient Civil Engineering of the World – You must know

Types of Estimates and Estimation Methods in Architecture and Civil Engineering

How Digital Technologies are Revolutionizing the Construction Industry

Understanding Project Delivery Methods

Project delivery methods refer to the various approaches used to organize, manage, and execute construction projects. Each method involves distinct roles, responsibilities, and contractual arrangements among project stakeholders, including the owner, designer, contractor, and other parties involved. The choice of the delivery method significantly impacts project outcomes, as it influences collaboration, risk allocation, and overall project efficiency.

Design-Bid-Build (Traditional Method)

Overview: The Design-Bid-Build (DBB) method, also known as the traditional method, is one of the most widely used project delivery approaches in construction. It follows a linear sequence where the project owner first hires an architect or designer to create detailed construction documents. Once the design is complete, the project is put out for competitive bidding, and the lowest responsive bid is awarded the construction contract.

Characteristics:

Sequential Process: The DBB method follows a sequential process, where each phase (design, bid, and build) is completed before moving on to the next.
Clear Division of Responsibilities: The roles and responsibilities of each party (owner, designer, and contractor) are well-defined and separate.
Competitive Bidding: Contractors competitively bid for the construction contract, often based on the completed design documents.
Lowest Bid Selection: The contract is typically awarded to the contractor with the lowest responsive bid, meeting all requirements.

Advantages:

Clarity: Clear separation of responsibilities ensures that each party focuses on its area of expertise.
Widely Recognized: The DBB method is familiar and widely accepted in the construction industry.
Cost Certainty: Since the design is complete before bidding, the owner has more certainty about the project’s total cost.

Considerations:

Time-consuming: The sequential nature of the method may result in longer project durations.
Limited Collaboration: Limited collaboration between the design and construction teams during the early stages may lead to missed opportunities for innovation or cost-saving measures.
Change Orders: Changes after the design phase may lead to change orders, potentially impacting project costs and timelines.

Design-Build (DB)

Overview: The Design-Build (DB) method is characterized by a single entity, the design-builder, responsible for both the design and construction of the project. The owner enters into a contract with the design-build entity, streamlining the process and promoting collaboration between design and construction teams from the project’s inception.

Characteristics:

Integrated Team: The design-build entity consists of both designers and constructors working collaboratively as a single team.
Single Contract: The owner enters into a single contract with the design-build entity, simplifying the contractual relationships.
Fast-Track Option: Design and construction phases overlap, allowing for faster project delivery compared to the DBB method.

Advantages:

Streamlined Communication: The integrated team fosters open and efficient communication, reducing the potential for misunderstandings and delays.
Faster Project Delivery: The overlapping design and construction phases enable faster project completion.
Accountability: The design-build entity assumes responsibility for both design and construction, leading to increased accountability.

Considerations:

Limited Owner Control: The owner relinquishes some control over the design process in exchange for the benefits of integration.
Innovative Solutions: While collaboration is encouraged, the owner may need to ensure that their specific requirements and preferences are adequately addressed.

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)

Overview: The Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) method involves the early engagement of a construction manager during the design phase. The construction manager provides input on constructability, cost estimates, and scheduling, acting as an advisor to the owner. Once the design is complete, the construction manager assumes the role of the general contractor and is “at risk” for delivering the project within a guaranteed maximum price (GMP).

Characteristics:

Early Involvement of Construction Manager: The construction manager is involved in the project from its early stages, providing valuable input during design development.
Collaborative Approach: The owner, designer, and construction manager work collaboratively to achieve project goals.
GMP Contract: The construction manager provides a guaranteed maximum price for the project, assuming the risk of any cost overruns.

Advantages:

Constructability Input: Early involvement of the construction manager ensures that constructability considerations are integrated into the design.
Cost and Schedule Control: The G

MP contract provides cost and schedule certainty for the owner.

Collaborative Decision-Making: The collaborative approach fosters effective decision-making and value engineering opportunities.

Considerations:

Selection of Construction Manager: The selection of an experienced and reliable construction manager is critical for the success of the CMAR method.
Negotiation of GMP: The negotiation of the GMP requires careful consideration to ensure that it aligns with the project’s scope and objectives.

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

Overview: The Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) method is a collaborative approach that involves all key project stakeholders, including the owner, designer, contractor, and other relevant parties, from the project’s early stages. IPD promotes a shared risk and reward model, fostering collective decision-making and accountability.

Characteristics:

Collaborative Governance: The project stakeholders form a multi-party agreement that outlines their roles, responsibilities, and shared objectives.
Risk and Reward Sharing: The stakeholders agree to share risks and rewards based on the project’s outcomes.
Continuous Collaboration: Collaboration and open communication among all stakeholders are fundamental to the success of IPD.

Advantages:

Shared Accountability: IPD encourages a collective commitment to project success among all stakeholders.
Enhanced Innovation: The collaborative environment promotes innovation and creative problem-solving.
Efficient Decision-Making: Continuous collaboration streamlines decision-making and issue resolution.

Considerations:

Trust and Communication: A high level of trust and effective communication among all stakeholders is essential for the success of IPD.
Legal and Contractual Arrangements: IPD requires specific contractual structures to ensure the equitable sharing of risks and rewards.

Selecting the Right Project Delivery Method

The selection of the most appropriate project delivery method depends on several factors, including the project’s size, complexity, timeline, budget, and the owner’s specific preferences and goals. Here are some considerations to guide you in choosing the right approach:

Project Objectives: Define the project’s primary objectives, such as cost certainty, project schedule, or innovation, and choose a method that aligns with these goals.
Project Complexity: Complex projects may benefit from collaborative approaches like DB or IPD, while more straightforward projects may suit the traditional DBB method.
Owner’s Risk Tolerance: Consider the owner’s risk tolerance and willingness to take on a more proactive role in project decision-making.
Budget and Schedule: Evaluate the project budget and schedule requirements, and choose a method that optimizes cost and timeline efficiency.
Experience and Expertise: Assess the expertise and experience of the project team and stakeholders involved, as certain methods require a higher level of collaboration and coordination.

Impact of Different Project Delivery Methods on a Project: A Comparative Example

To understand the real-world impact of different project delivery methods, let’s consider a hypothetical construction project: the construction of a new office building for a growing technology company. We will explore how each project delivery method could influence the project’s outcomes.

Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Method:

Impact: In the DBB method, the owner first hires an architect to design the office building. Once the design is complete, the project is put out for competitive bidding, and the lowest responsive bid is awarded the construction contract.

Example: In the DBB scenario, the architect designs the building based on the owner’s preferences and requirements. During the bidding process, multiple contractors submit bids for the construction. The owner selects the contractor with the lowest bid, which may lead to cost certainty. However, the sequential nature of the method could result in longer project durations as the construction phase begins only after the design is finalized.

Design-Build (DB) Method:

Impact: With the DB method, the owner enters into a single contract with a design-build entity responsible for both the design and construction of the office building.

Example: In the DB approach, the owner collaborates closely with the design-build team from the project’s inception. The team offers constructability input during the design phase, ensuring that the design aligns with construction feasibility. The integrated team streamlines communication, expediting decision-making, and potentially shortening the project timeline. The owner benefits from a faster construction process and streamlined accountability, as the design-build entity is responsible for both design and construction.

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) Method:

Impact: In the CMAR method, the owner involves a construction manager during the design phase to provide constructability insights and cost estimates. Once the design is complete, the construction manager assumes the role of the general contractor and guarantees the project’s maximum price (GMP).

Example: In the CMAR scenario, the construction manager collaborates with the owner and designer during the design phase, offering valuable constructability input. As the construction manager is “at risk” for delivering the project within the GMP, they work diligently to control costs and adhere to the schedule. This collaborative approach fosters innovative problem-solving, and the GMP provides the owner with cost certainty and potential savings if the project comes in under budget.

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Method:

Impact: The IPD method involves all key stakeholders, including the owner, designer, and contractor, collaborating from the project’s early stages. They share risks and rewards based on project outcomes.

Example: In the IPD approach, the owner, architect, and contractor form a multi-party agreement outlining their roles and responsibilities. They collaboratively set project objectives, budgets, and timelines. Continuous collaboration allows for collective decision-making, fostering innovation and creativity throughout the project. Shared risks and rewards promote a collective commitment to project success, leading to a high level of accountability among all stakeholders.

Conclusion

In the world of construction, project delivery methods play a significant role in shaping the success of a project. The choice between traditional methods like Design-Bid-Build or more collaborative approaches like Design-Build and Integrated Project Delivery can greatly influence project outcomes, from cost and schedule certainty to innovation and collaboration. As a beginner in the construction industry, understanding these methods and their implications will empower you to make informed decisions and embark on a successful construction journey.

Project Delivery Methods in Construction: FAQs

What are project delivery methods in construction?

Project delivery methods refer to the various approaches used to organize, manage, and execute construction projects. They determine the roles and responsibilities of project stakeholders and influence collaboration and risk allocation.

How do project delivery methods impact construction projects?

The choice of project delivery method significantly impacts project outcomes, including cost certainty, project schedule, collaboration, and overall project efficiency.

What is the Design-Bid-Build (DBB) method?

The Design-Bid-Build method is a traditional approach where the project owner hires an architect or designer to create detailed construction documents. The project is then put out for competitive bidding, and the lowest responsive bid is awarded the construction contract.

What are the advantages of the Design-Bid-Build method?

The Design-Bid-Build method offers clarity in roles, is widely recognized in the industry, and provides cost certainty as the design is complete before bidding.

What is the Design-Build (DB) method?

The Design-Build method involves a single entity, the design-builder, responsible for both the design and construction of the project. The owner enters into a single contract with the design-build entity.

What are the advantages of the Design-Build method?

The Design-Build method promotes streamlined communication, faster project delivery, and increased accountability of the design-build entity.

What is the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) method?

The Construction Manager at Risk method involves the early engagement of a construction manager during the design phase. The construction manager provides input on constructability, cost estimates, and scheduling and assumes the role of the general contractor during construction.

What are the advantages of the Construction Manager at Risk method?

The CMAR method benefits from constructability input, cost, and schedule control through the guaranteed maximum price (GMP) contract and collaborative decision-making.

What is the Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) method?

The Integrated Project Delivery method involves all key project stakeholders, including the owner, designer, and contractor, collaborating from the project’s early stages. IPD promotes a shared risk and reward model.

What are the advantages of the Integrated Project Delivery method?
- The IPD method encourages shared accountability, enhanced innovation, and efficient decision-making through continuous collaboration.
How can I choose the right project delivery method for my project?
- Consider factors such as project objectives, complexity, owner’s risk tolerance, budget, schedule, and the expertise of the project team to select the most suitable approach.
Are collaborative project delivery methods suitable for all projects?
- Collaborative project delivery methods like Design-Build and IPD are well-suited for complex projects with a high emphasis on collaboration and innovation.
Is the Design-Bid-Build method still commonly used in construction?
- Yes, the Design-Bid-Build method remains one of the most widely used project delivery approaches in the construction industry.
Can I combine elements of different project delivery methods for my project?
- Yes, some projects may benefit from hybrid approaches that combine elements of different project delivery methods to meet specific project requirements.
How does the choice of project delivery method impact project risk?
- The choice of project delivery method can influence risk allocation among project stakeholders and affect the level of risk assumed by each party.
Can project delivery methods impact project cost and schedule?
- Yes, the selection of the project delivery method can impact project cost certainty and timeline efficiency.
Is there a “best” project delivery method for all construction projects?
- There is no one-size-fits-all “best” project delivery method. The most appropriate method depends on the unique characteristics and objectives of each project.
Can I change the project delivery method after the project has started?
- While it is possible to change the project delivery method during the early stages, it may result in complexities and additional costs.
Is early collaboration among project stakeholders essential for project success?
- Yes, early collaboration among project stakeholders, regardless of the chosen method, can lead to better project outcomes and smoother project execution.
How can I ensure the successful implementation of the chosen project delivery method?
- Success depends on effective communication, cooperation, and a clear understanding of roles and responsibilities among all project stakeholders.

Sources-

The American Institute of Architects (AIA) – https://www.aia.org/
The Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) – https://cmaanet.org/
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) – https://www.asce.org/
The Project Management Institute (PMI) – https://www.pmi.org/
Engineering News-Record (ENR) – https://www.enr.com/

Spread the love